Analysis
Jonathan Head
BBC News, Phnom Penh
Cambodia's awful history has offered few figures of authority who
engender respect, let alone affection. So it is perhaps fitting that so
much of the population has joined the hushed lines snaking past the
gilded sarcophagus of former King Sihanouk, a man whose tortuous career
was inextricably entwined with the fate of his country.
Quietly, a few people have let it be known they would have pointed out some of Sihanouk's glaring flaws at another time,
but not when there is such a powerful public appetite to think fondly
of the "Papa King", as he styled himself. Every public comment I have
heard talks of his devotion to the country, and of the many good things
he did for Cambodia.
But how good were they? Appointed king by the French colonial
authorities at the age of 18 in 1941, Sihanouk proved to be a masterful
tactician as he confounded their expectations and drove a successful
campaign for Cambodian independence in 1955. He then abdicated from the
throne, and went on to become prime minister, and then chief of state.
He had unchallenged power for more than a decade.
He used it to push through modernisation projects for his country. But many of these proved impractical, and many more were never properly implemented. He tolerated no opposition and harshly repressed anti-government movements, until being ousted by a coup in 1970.
He always believed he was indispensible, and some believe this led to
his fateful decision to ally himself with the Khmer Rouge, in the early
1970s and in the 1980s.
0 comments:
Post a Comment