Park Geun-hye (L) and Moon Jae In (R) |
Associated Press
SEOUL, South Korea — South Koreans bundled in thick mufflers and parkas braved frigid weather Wednesday to choose between the liberal son of North Korean refugees and the conservative daughter of a late dictator. For all their differences, the presidential candidates hold similar views on the need to engage with Pyongyang and other issues.
One big reason: Many voters are dissatisfied with current President Lee
Myung-bak, including with his hardline stance on the country’s
authoritarian rival to the north. Park Geun-hye, who belongs to Lee’s
party, has had to tack to the center in her bid to become South Korea’s
first woman president.
Earlier polls showed Park and liberal candidate Moon Jae-in in a dead
heat in the race to lead Asia’s fourth-largest economy and an important
U.S. security bulwark in the region.
“I skipped breakfast to vote. I’ve been waiting to vote for five years. I
think it’s time to change the government,” said 37-year-old Kim
Young-jin as he hurried to a polling station set up inside an apartment
complex. Kim, who voted for Moon, said he was excited to be
participating in what he called a historic moment in South Korean
history.
There’s deepening worry about the economy and disgust over the alleged involvement of aides close to Lee in corruption scandals.
Many voters blame Lee’s hardline views for encouraging North Korea to
conduct nuclear and missile tests — including Pyongyang’s rocket launch
last week. Some also say the chill in North-South relations led to two
attacks blamed on Pyongyang that killed 50 South Koreans in 2010.
At one polling station in Seoul, young and old voters alike stood in
line, despite a bitter cold snap. Wednesday is a national holiday in
South Korea. Electric stoves inside the polling station warmed the line
of voters that stretched longer as the sun rose. Polls opened at 6 a.m.
local time. Some voters blew on their freezing hands as they hurried
into the polling station.
More than 13,000 polling stations have been set up across the country, according to South Korea’s election watchdog.
The effort to create distance with Lee has been more difficult for Park,
whose popularity rests on a staunchly conservative, anti-North Korea
base.
Both candidates propose pulling back from Lee’s insistence that
engagement with North Korea be linked to so-far-nonexistent nuclear
disarmament progress by Pyongyang. Park, however, insists on more
conditions than Moon, who wants to restore large-scale government aid.
Moon is a former chief of staff to Lee’s predecessor, late President Roh
Moo-hyun, who championed the so-called “sunshine policy” of
no-strings-attached aid for Pyongyang.
Moon wants an early summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un. Park
has also held out the possibility of such a meeting, but only if it’s
“an honest dialogue on issues of mutual concern.”
Whoever wins the presidential Blue House will set the initial tone for
new North Korea policy not just in Seoul but in Washington, Beijing and
Tokyo. All those governments have recently undergone an election, a
change of leadership or both, and they have been waiting for a new South
Korean leader before making any big decisions on North Korea policy.
A Moon election could lead to friction with Washington if new engagement
with Pyongyang comes without any of the reciprocal nuclear disarmament
progress that Washington demands from the North.
Moon and Park also agree on the need to fight widespread government
corruption, strengthen social welfare, help small companies, close
growing gaps between rich and poor, ease heavy household debt and rein
in big corporations that have grown so powerful they threaten to eclipse
national laws. They differ mainly in how far they want to go.
Moon wants to drastically expand welfare, while Park seeks more cautious
improvement in the system, out of concern that expanding too much could
hurt the economy, according to Chung Jin-young, a political scientist
at Kyung Hee University in South Korea.
Both candidates also have promised to strengthen the traditional
alliance with the United States while boosting economic ties with
booming China.
Park is aiming to make history as the first female leader in South Korea
— and modern Northeast Asia. But she also works under the shadow of her
father, Park Chung-hee, who imposed his will on South Korea as dictator
for 18 years until his intelligence chief killed him during a drinking
party in 1979.
Park’s father is both an asset and a soft spot. Many older South Koreans
revere his strict economic policies and tough line against North Korea.
But he’s also loathed for his odious treatment of opponents, including
claims of torture and snap executions.
“Nostalgia for Park Chung-hee still runs deep in our society, particularly in the older generation,” Chung said.
A Park win would mean that South Korean voters believe she would evoke
her father’s strong charisma as president and settle the country’s
economic and security woes, Chung said.
Moon, on the other hand, was a young opponent of Park Chung-hee. Before
working for Roh, whom Lee replaced in 2008, Moon was a human rights
lawyer. He also spent time in jail for challenging the government of
Park.
Moon’s parents lived in the North Korean port city of Hungnam before
fleeing to South Korea aboard a U.S. military ship in December 1950, six
months after the Korean War broke out. They were among an estimated
100,000 North Korean refugees transported by the United States from
Hungnam to South Korea in daring evacuation operations that month.
Moon’s parents lived in an interim shelter on South Korea’s southeastern
Geoje Island and later moved to a nearby village where Moon was born in
1953. Moon’s father, a former agriculture official at Hungnam city
hall, did manual labor at the camp while his mother peddled eggs.
A Moon win would be a clear judgment against the Lee government, said
Hahm Sung Deuk, a political scientist at Korea University in Seoul.
Moon’s appeal is that he “appears to be nice, honest and clean.”
With South Korea’s economy facing a 2 to 3 percent annual growth rate
for this year and the next, the presidential candidates have focused on
welfare and equality and fairness issues. Neither, however, has matched
Lee’s campaign promise to boost South Korea’s economy by an ambitious 7
percent growth annually, apparently aware of the global economic
challenges that beset the country’s export-driven economy.
Economic worries may be the focus of many voters, but North Korea has
forced itself as an issue in the closing days of campaigning with its
rocket launch last week, which the United States and others call a cover
for a banned test of technology that could power a missile to the U.S.
mainland. North Korea says it sought only to put a peaceful satellite
into orbit.
The launch won’t be a major election influence, but it will consolidate
conservative votes in favor of Park, said Hahm. He said the launch will
remind South Korean voters that “the North Koreans are unpredictable and
belligerent.”
The rocket launch could also make it harder to quickly mend relations with North Korea, especially if Park wins.
“She has a firm stance on national security, but she has few ideas on
how to establish a peace regime and lacks the determination to do so,”
said Cheong Seong-chang, a North Korea analyst at the private Sejong
Institute in South Korea. “If Park becomes president, South-North
relations would get better, but a big improvement in ties would be
difficult.”
___
AP writers Sam Kim and Youkyung Lee contributed to this story.
0 comments:
Post a Comment