Editor's note: Benjamin Habib is
a Lecturer in Politics and International Relations at La Trobe
University, Melbourne, Australia. Habib is an internationally published
scholar with research and teaching interests including the political
economy of North Korea's nuclear program, East Asian security,
international politics of climate change.
Melbourne (CNN) -- The curious timing of North Korea's Unha-3 rocket launch,
outside of its usual spring-summer launch window, raises questions
about the political motivations behind Pyongyang's attention-grabbing
move.
On Wednesday morning,
just before 10 a.m. local time, South Korean news agency Yonhap and the
Japanese government reported that the rocket had been launched. It came
just days after North Korea extended the launch window due to technical
issues.
Read more: North Korea rocket breaks up in flight
Taking heed of launch and
the usual caveats about reading North Korean government behavior, we
can discern three motives underlying Pyongyang's latest move:
international bargaining, domestic legitimacy and strategic leverage.
Benjamin Habib
This year, Northeast Asia
is experiencing a unique convergence of elections and leadership
transitions in the United States, China, Japan and South Korea. This
follows the change of leadership in North Korea in December 2011.
Read more: Photos of North Korea's newest rocket
With Barack Obama's re-election in Washington and Xi Jinping named as the new Chinese President,
the region awaits the outcomes of the Japanese election on December 16
and the South Korean presidential poll on December 19.
Proliferation-related negotiating activity is on hold, leaving a
diplomatic vacuum until the new governments are settled.
While North Korea appears
to have no intention of relinquishing its nuclear or missile
capabilities, its habitual tactic of engineering crises to leverage aid
from the international community in exchange for de-escalation or
proliferation freeze agreements is predicated on negotiations actually
taking place.
Read more: The limits of North Korea's media openness
North Korea fires long-range rocket
China indecisive on North Korea
S. Korea eyes future threats from North
External aid fills gaps
in the domestic economy and satisfies vital needs such as food and
energy that the regime cannot provide for indigenously. The gambit fails
if there are no negotiations.
A December rocket launch
sends a strong signal from Pyongyang to its regional interlocutors to
ensure that North Korea does not get overlooked amid the bureaucratic
maelstrom that usually follows changes in government.
It will test the resolve
of the new leadership teams and yield clues as to how they are likely
to react individually and coordinate together in relation to North Korea
in future.
Read more: One week in North Korea
Whichever candidate wins
the election in Seoul is likely to move away from Lee Myung-bak's
disastrous "reciprocity" policy toward greater engagement with
Pyongyang. Japan is likely to adopt a more hawkish approach to North
Korea if the Liberal Democratic Party wins the election, as polls
currently suggest. How North Korea fits within the Sino-American
relationship will also be of interest to Pyongyang, with Xi Jinping and
his new Politburo Standing Committee at the helm in Beijing.
A successful rocket launch would also represent a sterling commemoration of the first anniversary of Kim Jong Il's death
on December 17, much as the unsuccessful April launch was intended for
propaganda purposes as a celebration of Kim Il Sung's centenary.
By demonstrating
technological prowess, it would legitimize the regime's "strong and
prosperous country" rhetoric and bestow prestige on North Korea's young
new ruler, Kim Jong Un.
Similarly, Washington's
prickly reactions to Pyongyang's provocations play into the Kim regime's
anti-imperialist ideology, the staple of its propaganda output.
Read more: Witness to the cult of North Korea's Kim dynasty
Kim Jong Un's domestic
legitimacy will grow if Pyongyang proceeds with tentative and embryonic
economic reforms hinted at during the past year -- the 6.28 policy --in
North Korea's agricultural sector.
Any economic reform
program in North Korea risks creating new socio-economic cleavages --
grassroots entrepreneurialism and linkages to the global economy could
foster powerful domestic actors who may develop interests that differ to
those of the ruling regime.
For Kim Jong Un, legitimacy and prestige will be paramount if his government chooses to walk the path of economic adjustments.
One should also not discount the strategic motivations for the timing of the launch. In the past year South Korea has announced its deployment
of cruise missiles with a range of 1,000 kilometers, capable of hitting
targets anywhere in North Korea, along with tactical ballistic missiles
and drones with a range of 300 kilometers.
It's no stretch to
interpret North Korea's rocket launch in terms of a classic arms race,
as a missile test in response to its adversary's upgraded missile
systems.
The demonstration of a
viable long-range rocket will add another piece to North Korea's nuclear
deterrence posture. Pyongyang has yet to master long-range, multi-stage
missile technology, despite a long developmental phase punctuated by a
number of unsuccessful tests.
A successful launch may
herald a movement from the developmental phase of the long-range missile
program closer to deployment. This would increase Pyongyang's strategic
and diplomatic leverage in relation to its northeast Asian neighbors
and its ability to use this event as a bargaining chip to extract
further aid from the international community.
Foreign policy decisions are generally arise from a mixture of motivations.
The unique confluence of
leadership transitions across the region in late 2012 coincides with a
North Korean state at an interesting point in its evolution.
North Korea's rocket
launch suggests important clues about the manner in which Kim Jong Un
and his government are attempting to navigate the swirling regional,
strategic and domestic currents
0 comments:
Post a Comment