The economy picked up speed in February, creating jobs at a pace that
would substantially lower the unemployment rate. But Washington could
put a stop to that.
Even as analysts hailed a better-than-expected jobs report on Friday
that pointed to an acceleration in growth, they warned that stronger
employment gains are being put at risk by sequestration, the automatic
spending cuts being imposed by the federal government.
“They’re doing their best to get in the way,” Nigel Gault, chief United
States economist at IHS Global Insight, said of lawmakers and other
officials. “But the good news is that the economy is carrying plenty of
momentum going into sequestration.”
The Labor Department reported that the economy
added 236,000 jobs in February as the unemployment rate sank to 7.7
percent, down from 7.9 percent in January and the lowest level since
December 2008.
Wall Street expected no more than 165,000 additional jobs in February,
and the surprise helped lift the Dow Jones industrial average to another
new nominal record, its fourth for the week. It closed at 14,397.07.
But many experts said if it were not for political gridlock in
Washington, which led to the automatic spending reductions on March 1,
the performance of the job market and the broader economy would be even
more robust in the months ahead.
“It does suggest a bit more cushion heading into the spring, when we
will see the bulk of the impact from the sequester and fiscal pullback,”
said Michelle Meyer, senior United States economist at Bank of America
Merrill Lynch. “This was a good report. It’s hard to poke holes in it.
But we think we’ll see some slowdown in April and May because of the
sequester.”
Mr. Gault estimated that the economy would achieve a 1.5 percent growth
rate in the first half of 2013. Without the spending cuts and a rise in Social Security taxes that went into effect in January, he said, the economy would probably advance at double that pace.
As a result, he and other economists expected that the pace of job
creation would slow, leaving the unemployment rate not much lower than
where it is now. If jobs were added at February’s pace for the rest of
2013, the unemployment rate would crack the closely watched 7 percent
level by the end of the year. Instead, Ms. Meyer predicted that
unemployment would remain near 7.5 percent.
Macroeconomic Advisers, an independent forecasting firm, predicted that
the federal spending cuts would cost about 700,000 jobs this year, with
most of the damage occurring in the second and third quarters.
While the economy is expected to continue to add enough jobs to keep the
jobless rate from rising significantly, estimates like these suggest
that without the drag from Washington the labor market might have added,
on average, a robust 300,000 jobs a month or so.
The data for February, adjusted for normal seasonal variations, do not
reflect the federal cuts, which are expected to affect not just
government jobs but also industries that rely on public spending.
Public sector employment continued a long decline, with the number of
state and local government workers falling by 10,000 in February. Over
all, there are now 366,000 fewer government workers in the United States
than there were two years ago.
On Friday, the White House was quick to point to the new data as a sign
that the economy is strengthening even as it warned of the impact from
the squeeze on spending.
“The recovery is gaining traction,” said Alan Krueger, chairman of the
White House Council of Economic Advisers. But the sequestration, he
said, “is an unnecessary headwind. It’s something that will slow the
expansion. We’re poised for stronger growth if we don’t get in the way
with misguided fiscal policy.”
In some respects, the rest of the year is shaping up as a tug of war
between a strengthening private sector and federal austerity.
Private hiring last month was broad-based, with healthy job gains in
several areas, including business services and manufacturing.
This article has been revised to reflect the following correction:
Correction: March 8, 2013
An earlier version of this article misstated the month when the unemployment rate for high school graduates declined to 7.9 percent, from 8.1 percent. It was February, not January.
0 comments:
Post a Comment